Archaeologists believe the theory of appearance is wrongfirst man in africa

According to the well-established theory of the emergence and evolution of man, our
civilization originated on the African continent, and only
approximately 50-60 thousand years ago, homo sapien became gradually
settled all over the Earth.

However, archaeologists have repeatedly proved the fallacy of this view
orthodox science. For example, German antiquity researchers
found in Europe in the old riverbed of the Rhine last year human
teeth that are about 10 million years old. They are much older
the remains of Australopithecus Lucy, who is considered the ancestor of the modern
human and on the basis of which the theory of origin is built
civilizations in Africa.

And most recently, archaeologists discovered in Saudi Arabia
petrified human finger, which is 90 thousand years old. And
scientists have already determined that the homo finger was found in the Nefud desert
sapien. It turns out that people either earlier than in the accepted
orthodox science version, began to settle on the territory
planets, or mankind, after all, was born quite differently than
Scientists believe so far. Here is what the archaeologist says
from the university of oxford hugh grokutt who participated in
Arabian archaeological excavations:

Of course, we were very lucky to find
the human finger in the desert is much more complicated than the needle in the stack
hay. However, it seems that nature itself to us
�”Throws” the data needed to revise the erroneous theory of
origin of man in Africa. And although this question has long been
debated, Orthodox scholars do not want to admit
the obvious. This is understandable: based on the old theory, which is time
have already written off, as erroneous, a typed pile of scientific papers and
books, and their authors will resist the new
last …

Grokutt emphasized that the structure of the finger does not cause
the slightest doubt that he belonged to the hand of Homo sapien. It,
note, not even a finger, but a fragment of it, however so small
the detail can be a big argument for having to
revision of the established view of the origin of man and our
civilization in general.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: