A photo from open sources
These strange objects in the sky an American and his son noticed on a clear November evening when they were returning from school. As reported the author of the video, he immediately took out a smartphone and began to shoot UFOs, since they clearly did not resemble terrestrial aircraft.
This is how he described what he saw, because you can see for yourself:
Probably everyone who has encountered a UFO feels some excitement, very similar to euphoria and incomprehensible fear at the same time. For some reason, my hands were trembling as I got out and turned on the cell phone, and my little son felt accordingly, True, he rejoiced more from what he saw. Devices in the sky behaved very strange, they almost did not get close and at the same time withstood some distance, while the trajectory of their flight was difficult to predict. And all this happened in complete silence (at least least technical noise from running engines my son and I do not heard). You can think and say anything, but even my son immediately, as soon as we saw these objects, he shouted: “Dad, look – UFO! “. At the same time, I emphasize that in our family I did not notice hobbies ufology …
No wonder that after such a small shock, which experienced father and son from a meeting with a UFO, the American immediately posted the received video on the Internet. It should be noted that almost all Internet users agreed that these are not terrestrial aircraft apparatuses.
Ufologists are still silent, as a rule, they do a detailed analysis with comments when the authors of the material filmed immediately turn to him, in reputable ufological organizations, say, “Fade to Black” or MUFON, which has its own channels on YouTube video hosting. how experts say they receive up to 90 percent of the videos that they simply reject for various reasons. It’s hard to say how they would have acted with this video, but users perceived its quite normal, even without much criticism. notice, that professional ufologists have a negative attitude to various UFO compilations (see below), although online they are very popular. Next time we will try to get for our readers a comment by some famous ufologist why they do not like such collections, although, I think, in general terms, this is understandable and so: such collections are composed of the most “beautiful” plots, but not the most reliable in any way – not that selection criterion …
