A photo from open sources
We all know from textbooks on the history of Russia that in 1812 the French, led by Napoleon, entered Moscow. The capital was commissioned without a fight – it was a wise strategic plan of the Russian command led by Kutuzov.
And while Bonaparte waited for the defeated Russians to bring him the keys to Moscow and sit at the negotiating table in the capital of Russia a fire broke out, from which the whole city was practically burnt. After of this the French army was forced to leave Moscow and … flee home on the Smolensk road ravaged by her, suffering huge losses. So the myth of the invincibility of Napoleon’s army was dispelled, from this the collapse of his political career began.
A photo from open sources
Who set fire to Moscow?
Historians still argue who set fire to Moscow in September 1812 of the year? However, if you dig deeper, then it turns out that in it no side of the conflict was interested, he could not occur spontaneously, and indeed it was not a fire as such.
All versions of the Moscow fire are politicized, and therefore the truth is here it is very difficult to find, but it’s clear that neither Napoleon nor Russia is it was not necessary.
Maybe, after all, an accident? However, it is surprising that fires in Moscow has happened before, and even what, but so as a result 75 percent of the buildings were destroyed and tens of thousands died. people – this is simply unthinkable! For example, in 1737 he raged such a fire that swept the entire center of the capital and was commensurate with the tragedy of 1812. But then only ninety people died, and in September 1812, the “fire” consumed about thirty thousand the French, not to mention the Russians, who did not have time to evacuate from capital Cities.
And why are eyewitnesses describing this fire very strange? Special strange people who are at that time in Moscow, who were in a state of shock when the French were no longer to Russian soldiers, and the last – not to yesterday’s enemies and conquerors? People roamed the capital of Russia like somnambulists – why is it suddenly?
A photo from open sources
Finally, Moscow at the beginning of the nineteenth century was far from wooden. How did an ordinary fire wipe the face of the earth? literally to the base of three quarters of stone buildings? Even the Kremlin was completely destroyed. They didn’t save him from the fire, no matter how strange, neither the huge moats, nor the wide areas that separated Kremlin walls from the surrounding city buildings. Ditches at thirty meters wide and thirteen meters deep were so littered the wreckage of the “fire” that they then did not even begin to recover.
And although all this was later attributed to the French, who allegedly blew up Moscow, but they simply did not have any ammunition, nor a real opportunity to do this, and almost instantly. By the way, Napoleon, who was in the Kremlin at that time, was barely able to escaped, and only thanks to the fact that an underground passage from Kremlin across the Moscow River.
A photo from open sources
If we compare all the disparate data, evidence and recollections of eyewitnesses, then the picture develops that in that fateful September day in Moscow, an atomic bomb was detonated. it confirms the distribution of the background radiation level in the capital, he more eloquent than any words indicates traces of the use of nuclear weapons. From these traces one can clearly determine the epicenter of the explosion and dispersion of its radioactive products, which is consistent descriptions of witnesses of that “fire”.
From the memories of the French about the fire of Moscow
Now let’s turn to written sources, that is let’s see how the “Moscow fire” was described by the French, who are in that time in the capital of Russia. Here is what, for example, wrote in his diaries of the Napoleonic army lieutenant Charles Artois.
On that day, a soft sun illuminated Moscow with a golden light. Suddenly a second sun flashed, just above the true one, and so bright that it blinded my eyes, and Paul Berger, resting even a face scorched on the balcony. Our house and roof began to smoke, so that I had to fill them with water. In other estates that turned out to be closer to the “false sun”, fires started …
A photo from open sources
A week later, after the second sun flared up, Paul wrote that all soldiers and officers began to lose hair, people and horses turned out to be sick and weak, so the decision of the command to leave Moscow was received with great relief by all. And retreat Paul described it very peculiarly. From his notes it follows that French soldiers suffered not only from Russian frosts and Partisan raids, first of all – from some incomprehensible the disease they caught in Moscow. People could not eat, covered with ulcers and ulcers, why they died every day in hundreds, and the horses were weakening and falling. Artois himself returned to France disabled, resigned and soon died of the “Russian infection” in only thirty-two years old. According to the Moscow edition “Russians and Napoleon Bonaparte” (1814) the French for their over thirty thousand lost their forty-day stay in Moscow man, that is, as much as under Borodino. Why would this is?..
By the way, Napoleon, apparently, being in a stone building in the time of the appearance of the “second sun”, did not receive a strong dose of radiation, however, he died in captivity on the island of St. Helena not his death, and supposedly from arsenic poisoning, however, radiation symptoms diseases are very similar to such poisoning.
The Count de Segur also writes in his memoirs that his officers saw the “second sun” from which stone buildings flashed like candles, so from Moscow in a few minutes there were piles ruins. And among them, men, women and children roamed, as if blind ghosts, most in charred robes and black persons. Two officers, the count writes, were on that day Kremlin building, they saw an unusual light flare up in the sky, which then swept the palaces, why they began to crumble like house of cards. Shar, according to officers from all sides, broke out over the palace of Prince Trubetskoy …
A nuclear explosion at the beginning of the 19th century?
By the way, all these diaries and memoirs of the French are well known, however, historians choose from them only that which corresponds to the generally accepted doctrine of the fire of Moscow in 1812. For example, the most the version is circulated that Russians themselves burned Moscow in Kutuzov’s order, and the governor-general of Moscow became the performer Count Rostopchin, although he once explicitly wrote that such a blasphemous accusation against him, as well as against Kutuzov, this is bullshit.
A photo from open sources
Everything suggests that at that time Moscow was blown up atomic bomb. The light radiation from it burned all the stone buildings of the capital of that time, and people in the city just got a lethal dose of radiation, which is why the French army and suffered such enormous losses. But where in the beginning nineteenth century atomic weapons come from?
There are two versions, one more fantastic than the other. According to the first of them, a blow to the French was dealt by cryptocivilization – “great ancient “inhabiting underground Russia. Perhaps it’s for this reason Kutuzov left Moscow, although near Borodin the Russian army almost won the battle. It turns out that the leadership of Russia knew about the impending nuclear strike, that is, sacrificed buildings Moscow to save the homeland. Indeed, as I would have behaved Napoleon, if it were not for this “fire”, it is not known …
A photo from open sources
According to the second version, echoes came to Moscow at that time future nuclear explosion. It is believed that part of the energy from it moves in time. Then it turns out that Moscow is still waiting powerful nuclear attack, which will hook the tail and the Napoleonic the army of 1812, thereby disrupting the victory of Bonaparte over Russia. But there is something a lot of inconsistencies, for example, the solution remains incomprehensible Kutuzov leave Moscow, as if he or he himself had the gift foresight, or relied on the warning of some clairvoyant. Both are unlikely. Let’s just say this version is more mystical and therefore more implausible. Although in this life maybe not like that (see also puzzles in history), and the atomic bomb may well fly even from a parallel world …
Only one thing is clear that Moscow in 1812 was burned not from arson some saboteurs, but from a nuclear strike, it’s also clear that official historical science will never recognize this …
Time Moscow Napoleon Bonaparte Fires Russia Sun
