A photo from open sources American and British spies 11 years hack Russian computer systems in a row to find out that the “bad Russians” are planning where they are going to go, what speak with friends. And it’s not about government departments or large companies. In the list of goals for the Regin program under number one are private individuals. Giving rise to phobias there is such the disease is anatidephobia. It’s an obsessive fear somewhere in the world there is a duck that is watching you. It sounds silly and funny, but in recent years of phobia associated with global surveillance manifest more often. And these diseases are born in the USA. Edward Snowden First told how the NSA is “looking after” American citizens. AND now Symantec has described the global system in detail observations created by US computer scientists and Great Britain. Spies use special cunning software and already 11 years in a row invade the privacy of foreigners, first the turn of the Russians. Great Britain and the USA follow the “bad Russians” The first to know Regin was Microsoft Kaspersky Lab. Symantec revealed more information saying that this program is one of the most high-tech in the world and could only be created by forces one or more leading countries in the computer industry. Presumably it is about the USA and Great Britain, and the publication The Intercept claims that there can be no other option. Money for 11 years of existence of Regin have been spent a lot. Software taught hide under several levels of encryption and transmit data to the operator as discreetly as possible. “Stealth provides the ability to use this program for campaigns with a term of actions up to several years, “claim in Symantec. Regin It was not created to steal intellectual property. Spies don’t trying to access state archives or system management of nuclear facilities. Instead, they monitor citizens: find out where they are going to get information about booked hotel rooms and purchased plane tickets, and also listen to telephone conversations, which of course can sound and classified information. Whitewash black But as with the PRISM system from the NSA, the question also arises here: which amount of private information not related to US state security falling into the hands of spies? And you can whether to say that America generally has the right to finance similar projects? 
Photos from open sources As can be seen in the diagrams created Symantec, Russia is not the only, but the main goal of spies. Also in the top saudi arabia and surprisingly the Republic of Ireland and Mexico. All these countries are being monitored, first of all, for private individuals and small companies. Russians are always to blame and Chinese Note that the United States itself inflates to scandal each significant computer security incident. Often, all sins are blamed on Russian or Chinese hackers, which, according to the assurances of the Americans, work at the direction of the special services. Here is just a final example: a NATO summit in a hacker attack Wales. The reputable company iSight spoke about the actions of hackers Partners According to experts, the attackers tried to gain access to important documents drawn up during the summit and used vulnerability in the Windows operating system to get them. At hackers worked so fast that they inherited, and they succeeded calculate. Based on unpublished data, iSight concludes that the cyber villains were Russians, namely the Sandworm group, and they were supported by Russian special services. The conclusion is based on hypothesis that government securities are not so expensive, and getting them is very difficult, so hackers on their own they wouldn’t get involved in this matter. In light of recent events I want to ask our Western partners the question: do they consider By default, all of their hackers are “good” and ours are “bad”? After all invasion of the privacy of foreign citizens can only be justified announcing that any computer hacking by the US strengthens cybersecurity and contributes to the fight for human rights. If do not make such bold statements, it turns out that America is for her behavior in the vastness of the network can be punished. Svyatoslav Bocharov
Great Britain Life NATO USA
