Monkeys want to award copyright to selfie

Monkeys want copyright for selfiesPhoto from open sources

Representatives of the PETA animal rights organization appealed to court of the united states. Citizens advocating ethical treatment with animals, require officials to recognize copyright baboon on your own photos.

The story with unique pictures began five years ago. Autumn 2011 British nature photographer David Slater went on an expedition to Indonesia to take pictures of wild crested baboons. When a man walked away on business, leaving his camera unattended, one of the monkeys approached a tripod and I photographed myself twice.

Both images turned out to be very high quality and interesting. On the first selfie, the primate immortalized his smiling face, on the second – completely imprinted, this time with a serious mine. Can to think that the baboon uses such a technique constantly and the like “self-arrows” for him is the most familiar thing.

Needless to say, Slater was extremely shocked when found these pictures in the memory of the camera. Self curious the monkey, who was later nicknamed Naruto, got into the World cobwebs and circled the entire planet. However, no benefit from This Briton could not extract. Editions and Internet Resources deny David the copyright in the photo, arguing that that since he didn’t take the pictures, then the rights to them do not belong his.

Sue the monkey

All these years, Slater went to court, claiming his right. dispose of monkey selfies and use them in commercial purposes. Only recently did the U.S. District Court recognize that the animal cannot own the copyright and made david full the owner of the pictures.

A photo from open sources

This decision of the court caused a wave of indignation among zoodefenders. Representatives of PETA immediately filed a lawsuit to secure copyright the right to two selfies is precisely for the monkey who made them. By statement animal protectors, it is not written anywhere that our friends smaller ones may not have intellectual property rights, and since such a precedent happened, officials should seriously consider this issue.

In response, David Slater states that PETA, as usual, pushes water in a mortar, instead of helping animals that need real protection. The photographer is quite understandable – he literally take away bread. And where are the zoodefenders going to look for the same baboon? And how will the primate dispose images?

“If animals must have human rights, they also there must be human responsibility. That means I could would easily sue a monkey that is illegal I used my equipment. But I’m not going to do such nonsense, “retorts the Briton.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: