A photo from open sources
Such conclusions were made by one of the best Moscow experts Yuri Antipov. He has military training: engineer lieutenant technician to the plane. He took part in the investigation of a number of air accidents.
Today, an expert proves the identity of the “Ukrainian” Boeing under the number 9M-MRD with the Boeing – 9M-MRO, which disappeared without a trace in March. In order not to get confused in the rooms, remember: number 9M-MRD – Donetsk. That is the same one that fell near Donetsk.
So.
FIND SEVERAL DIFFERENCES
Look at the two characteristic differences that indicate that A Boeing flying out of Holland is like two drops of water like a Boeing, missing in March and not like a Boeing, considered to be shot down over Ukraine. We study the inscription “Malaysia” on the fuselage of aircraft. Inscription made differently. We report on the windows. Watching the location of the letter “U”. Its horizontal line above portholes.
The inscription on the aircraft with tail number 9M-MRO (liner, missing in March)
A photo from open sources
The end of the lower horizontal line of the letter “U” does not go beyond the size of the sixth porthole (if you count from right to left). For clarity vertical mark in blue. Also it should be noted that the initial letter “M” hangs over the 13th porthole.
Now we look at the inscription on board the plane considered to be shot down over Ukraine.
The inscription on the aircraft with tail number 9M-MRD
A photo from open sources
It can be seen that the lower end of the letter “U” is significantly shifted when inscription to the left and almost hangs over the seventh (the bill also – from right to left) porthole. For clarity, set vertical marks in blue. And look at the same inscription (as it is done) on an airplane flying out of Holland.
Photo of an airplane in Holland
A photo from open sources
Despite the lateral aspect of the shooting, it is even visually visible that the letter “U” does not go beyond the size of the sixth porthole. And no one image does not hang over the seventh porthole. But try it prove by geometric construction, given the cylindrical aircraft fuselage. For the starting base vertical line we take doorway line of the aircraft.
Geometric Length Measurements
A photo from open sources
The distance from the generatrix of the doorway to the end of the sixth porthole and to the end of the lower part of the letter “U” are equal. And we are not interested in the absolute value of these measured distances. It Depends on the magnification scale. The ratio of these lengths is important to us. AND it is practically equal to one. It is this ratio of these lengths inscriptions on the aircraft with tail number 9M-MRO.
Therefore, the location of the inscription “Malaysia” on board missing in March plane is in exact accordance with the location of the inscription on board the aircraft preparing to fly over Ukraine.
At the same time, the location of the letter “U” on the plane with the number 9M-MRD does not match the location of the letter “U” written in aircraft preparing for departure from Holland.
And this suggests that in Holland the plane was preparing for departure, identical in inscription to the 9M-MRO airplane (missing in March) and not similar to the inscription on the 9M-MRD.
There is also a difference in the fuselage, which sweeps away the possible objection that the fuselage of the aircraft after the initial photographing repainted and painted during repair The 14th porthole and stencil inscription on board were made otherwise, i.e. during the repainting of the 9M-MRD, he was definitely tailored to 9M-MRD bead standard.
The fact of repainting the fuselage of the 9M-MRD aircraft is easy to find out Malaysian Airlines. But, I repeat, this is not important. Look at second difference in fuselages.
Front part of aircraft fuselage with tail number 9M-MRD
A photo from open sources
The blue arrow indicates the white dot. Most likely this technological hatch. He is on both aircraft under consideration. Regarding it, we will consider damage to the fuselages airplanes. Immediately, I note that no damage is visible in photo No. 5.
The nose of the aircraft with tail number 9M-MRO
A photo from open sources
There is damage on the front of the plane that disappeared in March paintwork located at the bottom of the fuselage. Indicated by a red arrow. Such damage at this place on board 9M-MRD no.
And now we look at the board departing from Holland.
Holland aircraft fuselage damage
A photo from open sources
As you can see, damage to the paintwork in the same spot identical to damage recorded on board photo 9M-MRO, missing in March.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The identity of the fuselages (characteristic features) Boeing 777-200, missing in March and Boeing 777-200, shot down over Ukraine.
2. The dissimilarity of the fuselages (characteristic features) 9M-MRD aircraft, considered to be shot down over Ukraine and aircraft preparing for departure from Holland.
3. Identification carried out on the basis of features portholes.
4. Identification carried out on the basis of the particular application inscriptions on the sides.
5. Identification carried out on the basis of a comparison of characteristic damage to the paintwork on the bow airplanes.
6. Subject to paragraphs No. 3-5, the probability of aircraft identity Boeing777-200 (tail number 9M-MRO), missing in March 2014 and Boeing777-200 aircraft (tail number (9M-MRD), shot down over Ukraine, equal to almost 100%.
FROM THE EDITOR “Komsomolskaya Pravda”:
If someone did not understand the text due to a young age, we explain easier. Malaysian Boeing, shot down near Donetsk, does not look like A Boeing that flew out of Holland. But this Boeing, shot down near Donetsk, very similar to the Boeing, which disappeared in March. How could this happen? In this regard, you can put forward a lot versions, but we will grant this right to readers.
Time Moscow Ukraine
