Photos from open sources
A former Soviet nuclear intelligence officer says that on actually happened on September 11, 2001 in New York. Destruction 3 WTC buildings were not a terrorist attack. It was the only demolition Affordable Way – Nuclear Explosions … Official History about September 11th is like a sack chock full of lies and it seems to be a proven fact for the alternative community. So what really happened? New series of revelations of the former Russian nuclear intelligence officer shocking even those who believes that they have a clear idea of what is happening behind backstage. Why did the WTC buildings collapse? Analytical the work of an expert in nuclear explosions leads us to a shocking conclusion. When ordinary people saw how two planes hit World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York September 11, and the way the Twin Towers collapsed in dust clouds they were too shocked by these events to critique the events themselves. And so since then, strange ideas have been imprinted in their heads: that hollow aluminum planes supposedly can penetrate through and through steel buildings, while completely disappearing into them; and then that aviation fuel (kerosene) supposedly can “melt” these steel buildings in microscopic volatile steel powder … Early or later, these ridiculous delusions should have been discarded. The destruction of the Twin Towers has absolutely nothing to do with “airplanes”, as well as with the fire allegedly caused by “airplanes”. This is an obvious fact that occupies the minds of millions of Americans, dissatisfied with the official interpretation of the destruction of the World Shopping Center, over the past 6 years, at least. When there was an initial shock caused by the events of September 11, many people began to realize that the absurdities in the official version simply too much … Given that the fires in both Towers were caused by approximately the same amount of kerosene and, given that The towers were Gemini (i.e. absolutely identical in strength), this the mismatch was the first clear sign that their destruction had nothing to do with the fire. The next awareness has come then, when researchers on September 11 began to consider the fact the fact that the building number 7 of the World Trade Center (exclusively durable modern 47-story skyscraper on a steel frame) also collapsed in the same way in the early evening of that day, but when this, however, no planes fell into it. If in the destruction of the Twin Towers was officially charged with kerosene, which brought “aircraft”, the destruction of the WTC-7 was inexplicable before extent that the official Report of the Commission of Inquiry 11 September chose not to mention the destruction of building number 7 at all – as if the fact of the destruction of the 47-story modern skyscraper is not deserving even consideration. Comparison of all these events and the many absurdities surrounding the destruction of the WTC led the first researchers September 11 to the realization that their authorities simply fooling around and that the destruction of the World Trade Center doesn’t have no relation to kerosene or to “airplanes”, since airplanes were simply not needed. The fact that the WTC building number 7 collapsed in the early evening of September 11, 2001, successfully proved that the terrorist planes were redundant, and that the destruction of the World The Shopping Center would have happened anyway – regardless of “aircraft”. Someone just wanted the World Trade Center collapsed, and that is why he collapsed. From this moment, it was born like this called The Truth Movement for September 11th. People began to blame the US government is that it intentionally destroyed the World Shopping Center method that is widely used in construction industry and is known as “demolition.” More and more people in America begins to blame its own government for it was the main culprit for the September 11 attacks and, in the end, more than 65% of the US population expressed their distrust of the official explanation for the September 11 attacks and the destruction of the World Shopping Center. In fact, anyone who watched the then news videos carefully enough, will be able to recall these stills where the “third explosion” is mentioned: Screen captions: “CNEN 10.03. Breaking news – the third explosion smashed to smithereens World Trade Center in New York and CNEN 10.13. Arched news – the third explosion destroyed the World Trade Center in New York “Here it is – the same seditious video report of the company Си-Эн-Эн, в котором были показаны строки текста,claiming that there was some “third explosion”, which first “smashed to smithereens,” and then “destroyed” the South Tower of the World Shopping Center. North Tower (the one with the antenna) time has not fallen yet – it will fall a little later from the “fourth explosion” – but CNN will already have a strict reprimand from “good people “and will no longer mention seditious things like explosions. World Trade Center Twin Towers will declared “destroyed by kerosene”, and the WTC building number 7 (in which never got a single plane of the so-called. “terrorists”) – “destroyed by diesel fuel” (the stock of which was stored in building for emergency diesel generators). Understandable reasons most people who disagree with the official “kerosene” theory, the US government is accused of being deliberately demolished the World Trade Center. However these people do not have sufficient understanding of industrial demolition processes in general, and the demolition of the World Trade Center in particular. For this reason, a certain number of “conspiracy theories” have arisen, which range from allegations that the WTC was allegedly “mined with conventional explosives”, pending allegations of the fact that he was allegedly demolished with the help of the so-called “nano-termite” (some mystical and hitherto unheard of substance), which was allegedly used in the form of “spraying” on each metal part of the supporting structures of the Twin Towers. There are more bizarre conspiracy theories – the WTC demolition theory under using laser beams from space, for example. Of course, the authors these diverse conspiracy theories cannot yield to each other, and that way they spend precious time not only blame the US government for allegedly being the main the culprit on September 11th, but also for blaming one another in trying to “muddle the water of truth.” The general problem of all these authors of conspiracy theories is that they simply don’t know what really happened to the World Trade Center, and, most importantly, they don’t know why this happened. The author of this article. tried to introduce the reader to something else. Instead of offer another “conspiracy theory”, he offers his expert opinion, in addition to his testimony, that go along with his personal experience and knowledge gained in the result of service in the corresponding post in the Soviet Army. I I hope that as a result of this approach, the reader will receive a much more explanatory explanation regarding the demolition of the WTC, according to compared to what he could get on any An online forum specializing in conspiracy theories about 11 September. “Ground Zero” and “ground zero” First I I would like to remind everyone that the place of the former World Trade The New York City Center in English is called “Ground Zero” [“zero mark “or” epicenter “in the understanding of the Russian-speaking reader]. Many do not seem to be aware of exactly what they mean. the words “ground zero” and how important evidence they are. Many, apparently perceive “Ground Zero” as a proper name – as if it would be the name of a city or ship. However few recall today that the strange name “ground zero” was assigned to the site of the former WTC too quickly to be “Name Own. “Almost immediately after they collapsed Twin Towers (a few hours before building number 7 collapsed WTC) – i.e., around the afternoon of September 11, 2001 – almost all officials and some reporters have already started calling the place of the former WTC with the strange words “ground zero”. All issues the news that was printed the next day was also called the place of the former WTC is nothing other than “ground zero”, and these strange words were still written in lowercase. Like that use of the term “ground zero” in relation to the area of the former WTC lasted throughout September 12, 2001. And some news agencies continued to use the term “ground zero”, lowercase, and on September 13, 2001. AND only then, as if someone realized his mistake, the status of this strange name suddenly suddenly rose to “Ground Zero” from Capital Letters, and as such, finally, it has turned into a Name Own. But what did the words “ground zero” mean while they all still written in lowercase letters, i.e. while they are not yet acquired the status of their own name? Why almost immediately after the destruction of the Twin Towers, these strange words were used to mark the location of the WTC? Was it a mistake caused by confusion in the midst of the unprecedented events of September 11? I would answer yes. This was undoubtedly a mistake caused by general confusion and confusion. However, this was not a mistake in meaning that an inappropriate name was chosen to mean WTC demolition sites – if only because at that moment there was it’s too early to even choose the right name own. In fact, Civil Defense experts were absolutely right when they designated this zone with the words “ground zero. “There was absolutely no mistake. It really is was “ground zero” in the very sense in which this term is understood Civil Defense Specialists. However, this was a mistake. sense that these strange words “ground zero” were inadvertently “merged” to journalists, and through them to the general public. Thereafter it was too late to try to hush up widespread use this strange designation of the Civil Defense Service. And so desperate American officials simply had no other chance how to “headline” these seditious words and thus transform this own definition of civil service Defense in the Name of Own … WTC Nuclear Demolition Author of these lines was a career officer in the Soviet military unit 46179, which was also known as the 12th Special Control Service Main Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the USSR. “12th Main Management, in turn, was an organization that responded to USSR for safe storage, production control, routine maintenance, etc., of the country’s entire nuclear arsenal. IN while the Special Control Service was responsible for notching nuclear explosions. She also had a responsibility to control on compliance with international nuclear treaties tests. This is especially important in light of the existence of the so-called The 1976 “Peace Nuclear Explosion Treaty” between the USSR and United States of America [known in the USSR as the “Treaty between USSR and USA on Underground Nuclear Explosions for Peaceful Purposes of 1976 “]. In accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, the parties were required inform each other about all nuclear explosions in non-military purposes. During my service at the aforementioned organization at the end 80s I learned about the existence of the so-called “system nuclear emergency demolition built into the Twin Towers of the World Shopping Center in New York. Actually the “nuclear demolition system” based on powerful thermonuclear charges (about 150 kilotons per TNT equivalent), which were located at a depth of 50 meters below the lowest point of the foundation of each of the Towers. In those times it seemed strange to me, to be honest, because it was hard to believe in that the US authorities can be crazy enough to tear down buildings in the middle of a populated city using underground nuclear explosions. However, if I understood this correctly, no one was going to demolish the World Trade Center really. It was only a means of circumventing some bureaucratic obstacles. Horrific imagination a nuclear drift system was built into the Twin Towers not to demolish them in reality, but simply to to get permission to build them at all. The problem was that the then New York building code (as well as Chicago Building Code) did not allow the Department of Buildings issue permits for the construction of any skyscraper before as long as his designer did not provide the Department with and a satisfactory method of demolition of such a structure, moreover, as demolition in the future, and demolition in the event of an emergency. Since the late 60s (when the construction of the Twin Towers was first proposed) a similar type of building on a steel frame was fundamentally new concept, no one knew how to demolish such building. Traditional (“conventional”) demolition methods were applicable only in relation to buildings of the old type. Something was needed fundamentally new for incredibly strong steel Twin Towers. Those. something new was needed that could convince officials from the Department of Buildings issue permits to their construction. And this “something new” was finally found: nuclear drift … “Aircraft” Now, since I think that the reader already understood how strong the Twin Towers were, which was impossible to carry with conventional explosives, but only underground thermonuclear explosion of high power, it seems to me that It will be very interesting to consider another question. Could they aluminum passenger planes break through these twin towers through, as it was shown to us on TV? This is one of the most famous videos, showing how easy an aluminum plane breaks into steel tower – without reducing speed and without the slightest detail of an airplane falling back onto the street. Most revealing in this a specific video is that a person accidentally caught in the frame does not reacts neither to the sound of the supposedly “approaching airplane” nor to the sound [aluminum] “plane” breaking through [the armor] of the South Towers [like a knife through butter]. This person is starting to react. only the explosion itself inside the Tower. By the way, in this video, although not as distinctly as in the last video at the end of this article, but that’s it the same external aluminum linings knocked out by the explosion are noticeable from the inside and flying outward, slightly ahead of the fireball, moreover, flying off to the side diametrically opposite to the direction the movement of the “aircraft” that hit the Tower. First of all, that was it’s easier to understand, let’s get back to where I started for a short while this article: because the Twins fell not due to “kerosene”, but for due to thermonuclear explosions of high power, and, moreover, fell in “wrong sequence” and, in addition to everything, the building No. 7, which did not include “terrorist planes,” also for some reason collapsed, we can assume that the planes were simply not are needed. They were redundant. Since they could not add anything to the WTC demolition itself [kerosene for fire could have been brought in barrels]. And since the planes were redundant, you can safely suggest that the crime of September 11 could have been committed and no planes at all: the Twin Towers and the WTC-7 were to go into nonexistence, because someone wanted it, and their departure into nonexistence did not have nothing to do with “airplanes.” Therefore many thinking September 11 researchers began to question allegations US government that there were any “airplanes” that supposedly hit the Twin Towers. A lot of their work available on the Internet (in particular, the popular TV shows “September clues “and” FOXED OUT “available on YouTube) which contain detailed analysis of various videos for September 11, showing “airplanes”. These works are more than satisfactory prove that “airplanes” were digital. The author of these lines, however, prefers a different approach. Instead of exposing a critique of the absurdity of the videos mentioned above (since the attempt itself to such an analysis will undoubtedly cause a lot of criticism), the author of these lines immediately prefers to take the bull by the horns: aluminum cannot penetrate steel. Point. Think that aluminum Boeing-767 could really break those thick double-walled steel perimeters, as shown in the photographs above, is the same as believing that the laws of physics have decided for no reason from this take a day off on the eleventh day of the month of September two thousands of the first year from the birth of Christ … Someone can count like this: because airplanes, even made of aluminum, fly at a speed of almost 500 mph [~ 805 km / h], because of its huge masses and speeds they have sufficient kinetic energy to having to break through the Twin Towers, even though that the latter are made of steel. However, this is an unlawful approach. Yes, purely intuitively it seems that a huge fast-moving aircraft carries enormous energy, and it may seem to some that the plane can actually cause damage to the building in which it crashes. But what do you think will happen – hypothetically – if the plane will be motionless in the air, while a giant will take the exceptionally massive steel tower the WTC will swing it as it should and smash her in a big way at a speed of 500 mph such a motionless [aluminum] aircraft? Will it flatten blow this same plane? Or do you think the plane is clean will go through the building – so not the slightest detail of this plane will not remain outside the shell of the Tower (which is twice as thick as the frontal tank armor)? To make it even easier for you – imagine that you beat a stationary fly with a fly swatter at a fly swatter speed of 1 meter per second, then 10 meters per second, and then 100, and 200 meters in give me a sec. Can you achieve this “necessary” speed when which a fly, instead of flattening, will suddenly pass a whole and unharmed through a fly swatter, leaving in the last corresponding her hole silhouette? Not? Now imagine the same thing but a stationary fly swatter into which a flying fly crashes sequentially at speeds of 1 meter per second, 10 meters in second, and finally – 100 and even 200 meters per second. Can is it that a fly breaks a fly swatter? Think about it a hypothetical question, because whether it’s a moving plane, crashing into a motionless Tower, or, on the contrary, someone crashes The tower on a stationary plane, the physics of this event remains identical. Therefore, a “purely intuitive” opinion about the alleged armor-piercing abilities of “fast-moving aircraft” is not so “intuitive” in the light of the above example … Are there anyone who is ready to seriously believe that aluminum A Boeing can really break down entirely (along with its tail, wings and engines) through the steel columns shown below? Located a meter apart on the facades of the Towers? For someone may seem difficult – to understand that aluminum cannot punching steel. Therefore, solely for understanding this, here you a small hint – as a basic premise: it is known that artillery armor-piercing shells are made of materials which are stronger than the armor for which they are intended to penetrate. Usually they are made of tungsten (Americans, instead of expensive tungsten, also use depleted uranium-238, which is useless material, however, quite capable penetrate armor due to its large specific gravity and density, which exceeds the density of steel). Armor-piercing shells, made of aluminum do not exist – this is obvious. Same, as there are no aluminum sabers, as well as others piercing and cutting objects made of this metal. By her own the idea that an aluminum tool supposedly can cut steel is somewhat “strange”, if not crazy. Dmitriy Khalezov
Time Fires USSR USA
