A photo from open sources
A dog trainer from the state of new york some a while ago I published a series of videos on the Internet depicting presumably the remains of a real Bigfoot. Only Now Western cryptozoologists and paranormal researchers drew attention to these amazing videos.
Their author, Peter Kane, claims the parts show the videos. the body of a real bigfoot, which his father personally shot in 1953. Some fragments of a corpse, according to a man, frozen, others dried.
Hairy feet, severed arms, and even an icy head Sasquatch with perfectly even teeth – all this you can see on the videos below. Peter assures Internet users that these remains are real, and asks the audience to be more open to unknown. He says:
Of course, I like to sometimes make fun of others, but not in in this case. Everything that you see on the frames shot by me is absolutely really.
Amazing video recordings surprised how specialists in the field cryptozoology and ordinary users of the World Wide Web. TO Unfortunately, Kane refuses to provide the remains to scientists for DNA analysis and other tests. This is how easy guess, caused a lot of skepticism in his direction. Nonetheless, The American sees no reason to get involved with the people of science. Here as he explains his decision:
Scientists who do not recognize the existence of Bigfoot, in in any case, they’ll call it a fake to preserve their own reputation. If this were not so, then they would have long recognized and yeti, and chupacabra, and other mysterious humanoids that appear in our world doesn’t know where – evidence has already been accumulated abound. However, this notorious “unknown from where” and scares Orthodox, because otherwise you need to revise the whole our science. Can anyone really decide on this if I provide scientists the remains of a bigfoot? Do you believe that? And therefore no it makes no sense to repeat what has been repeated hundreds of times, and conclusions, as always, are the same – DNA will certainly be a bear or monkeys …
Indeed, the way it is, and this applies not only mysterious creatures mythically appearing in our reality, but the same story sucked out, as they say many researchers, from the finger. No finds by archaeologists no irrefutable artifacts proving that a person existed on earth hundreds of millions of years ago, cannot shake academic science and move it to review at least some well-established false postulates, for example, she does not agree even with by the fact that people settled on a planet not from Africa continent. And although there are already hundreds of irrefutable evidence, cart, as they say, and now in Africa. Therefore and I want to end my article with the ironic words of Peter Kane: and do you think that academic science based on some remains recognizes Bigfoot, no matter how …
Bigfoot DNA
