Photo from open sources
Experts once again examined the only film on which yeti captured. And they came to the conclusion that there is no smell of fake here. Meeting in the forest Many probably heard about the famous film Patterson-Gimlin. And someone even saw him. It is the only one in world shooting “bigfoot.” Or yeti. Or big foot like him called in the USA. At least on the screen it appears not blurry a stain or a dim shadow, but a living being.
A photo open source footage was made by Roger Patterson (Roger Patterson) and Bob Gimlin (October 20, 1967 years in the wooded and wild mountains of California. These people were by no means biologists and not even hominologists – those who persistently seek though would be the traces of yeti. They were rodeo members – professionally engaged in cowboy racing. But they, according to hominologists, incredibly lucky. Purely by accident. Riding around and suddenly met the Bigfoot. Specifically, a female. And managed to take off its not even a camera, but a movie camera. Since then, disputes do not subside – whether the film is fake or not. Already several people have admitted that they dressed up in a fur suit and walked along the edge of the forest. IN In 2002, it was even announced that the “father” of the yeti had died Ray Wallace (Raymond L. Ray Wallace), owner of the construction company. Allegedly it was he who organized the hoax, dressing in gorilla costume his wife. This was told by the son of Wallace. And told that his father advised Patterson in order to “snowy man “on frames looked natural. After 1967” snowy man “hasn’t been announced so explicitly anywhere. Patterson himself, who died of cancer in 1972, vowed to die that no There was no hoax. And he saw a real yeti. However, in the minds of many were imprinted: the Patterson-Gimlin film – fake. And there walks not a “bigfoot”, but an ordinary one. Only disguised in a suit with wool. Bigfoot’s father is not installed A digital copy of the film with enlarged details has recently appeared. AND cadres again became the object of research. They were led by an anthropologist, and anatomist Noah David Henson from Texas State University (Texas State University). His conclusion: there is no question of a fake. The creature’s height is accurately measured – 222.23 centimeters. Wallace obviously did not have such a huge wife. Then is, he invented that he had changed her. Yes, and men of this height are not just find it. Henson saw a natural muscle play that is not could pass on any costume. And the yeti’s face is by no means a mask. The expert points out the ratio of the creature’s arms length to its growth. It is much higher than in humans. According to statistics, similar proportions can be found in one person out of 52 million. For all of America such would have accumulated no more than three. And it is unlikely that one of them specially found and attracted to the shooting. And the female breasts that visible to the creature? According to Henson, even with the most sophisticated fantasies of hoaxes would not have thought of supplementing the “costume” such details. Of course, Wallace’s wife had breasts. But not as huge as eyewitnesses recall. And one more feature: the creature’s gait indicates that it was pregnant. Henson believes that in the film Patterson-Gimlin could not dressed man dressed up. And, therefore, Wallace didn’t father. And a certain hominoid fell into the frame. Secret examination in USSR In December 1971, the film “about the Bigfoot” was brought to Moscow Canadian explorer Rene Dahinden. Big secret He was shown in several scientific institutions. Specialists Central Research Institute of Prosthetics and Prosthetics immediately indicated unlike the gait of the creature filmed in the film from the gait modern man. And at its enormous weight. Head of Department Biomechanics State Central Institute of Physical culture (now the Academy of Physical Culture) professor Donskoy even gave a written opinion. And emphasized that creature gait for person “completely not typical.” He has a “natural movement, without noticeable signs of artificiality characteristic of different kind of deliberate imitations. “Then they connected to the examination and famous homologues – Dmitry Bayanov and Igor Burtsev, who they wrote a whole book, proving that the film is not fake. Found Dozens of differences between a shot creature and a person. And also came to the conclusion that the creature’s hairline cannot indicate special suit, because, despite this cover, distinctly the muscles of the arms, back and legs are visible. Head landing, lack visible neck, elongated barrel-shaped torso and elongated upper limbs distinguish yeti from man. “Obviously, the former research, and current ones will not convince skeptics. Although Hensen admitted that he himself was a skeptic – did not believe in existence Bigfoot. Until I studied the film in detail Patterson-Gimlin.
Yeti
