Photos from open sources of
Archaeologists are constantly making adjustments to the age of Homo sapiens, not despite the fact that the orthodox from science do not like this at all. So, as a result of a recent paleontological find in the territory Morocco, studied the skeletons of ancient people, which in all respects fit the definition of a reasonable person. The age of the remains is more than 315 thousand years, from which it can be concluded that Homo sapiens older than 100 thousand years than previously thought academic science.
Paleontologists presented their findings in a scientific work, published the other day in the journal Nature. Researchers in it emphasize that the five skeletons found near the cities of Marrakech, do not indicate the origin of Homo sapiens in the north of the African continent. Civilization most likely originated throughout Africa, as evidenced, for example, DNA study of a boy from the south of this continent, progenitors which, as it turned out, isolated from other African branches about 260 thousand years ago.
The published work caused heated debate among scientists, inveterate “academics” do not agree with current conclusions paleontologists, seeing in the found skeletons some details in protruding chin and forehead that are characteristic of Neanderthals, not for Homo sapiens.
A photo from open sources
At the same time, independent researchers remind the Orthodox of science of the Texas find of 1934 – the “London hammer”, which more than 100 million years. And what about shoe prints on fossils that are 200 to 500 million years old? And such mysterious traces are found in different parts of the world. There are others numerous “uncomfortable artifacts” (see video below), testifying that a reasonable person existed significantly earlier and, moreover, not only on the African continent. therefore talk about such a meager age of homo sapiens as 200 or 300 thousand years, and to ascribe the origin of civilization to Africa – this long-outdated data that it’s time to throw in a landfill stories.
However, academic science relies and will rely only on established historical data, even if they contradict new finds and the long-known truth that history, including the birth of our civilization, dozens have been written and rewritten (if not more) times. Not for nothing that the conspiracy theorists argue that the most Inaccurate science is just history. It can be compared with fiction, at least with historical novels. But does can novels be considered a true story? ..
Africa DNA
