A photo from open sources
UNU Artificial Intelligence Platform predicting the future intuition and life experience of people easily predicted the winners of the Super Bowl, Oscar winners, and now here also brought a gain of almost eleven thousand dollars (with a bet of only twenty) at the races in Derby, guessing which horses take prizes. The winner went to the creator of this unique systems to Lewis Rosenberg.
UNU is a swarm intelligence based on intuitive capabilities of not one but a whole group of people. Each the person in this group logs on to the computer or smartphone and answers the question she posed using suggested answer options. In this party helps virtual magnet that they move around the screen (almost by intuition), so the puck attracted to one or another answer. To make a decision the participant is given only a minute.
A photo from open sources
Such artificial intelligence is called a swarm because his prototype was taken as an ordinary bee swarm with his collective mind, which accurately determines where to build a hive. UNU in this case uses the intuition and knowledge of a certain group of people to making the right decision. Something like this sociological or any other survey, however in this case artificial intelligence does not divide participants into subgroups, but simply looking for the best solution based on all the answers, and quickly and effectively. That UNU guessed eleven out of fifteen winners of the Oscars and brought Lewis Rosenberg eleven thousand winning at the races, eloquently speaks in favor of this system.
Swarm Intelligence – Pros and Cons
The creator of UNU himself is convinced that its purpose is not to guess winners, that is far beyond gambling and entertainment. Based on this system, it will be possible in the future to effectively hold consultations of doctors, take collective solutions at the scale of large corporations or even the country as a whole, well etc. The UNU system, says Lewis Rosenberg, is fast making the right collective decision for any difficult questions.
However, the creator of UNU found many opponents who were skeptical of this invention. In their opinion, it It will be widely used in gambling, but not for collective decision making in serious matters. We have, skeptics say even elections in the most democratic countries before are still being rigged, so these or other power structures will never be allowed to decide for them some abstract, completely uncontrollable swarm mind. Yes, and in gambling nobody needs such artificial intelligence, because it’s practically the collapse of the empire of excitement …
Artificial Intelligence
