A photo from open sources
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, acting under the auspices of the UN, decided to put an end to the dispute over global warming. Climatologists stated (and experts agree with them) that the temperatures on Earth are indeed rising. Trouble in the fact that such changes lead to an imbalance of the entire system the planet.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, operating under the auspices of the UN, issued an alarming report in which warned about the consequences of inaction regarding the problem global warming. It, according to the experts of the group, has an increasingly noticeable effect both on land and in the oceans. In case of further inaction, warming will be have serious consequences, up to the complete destruction of civilization already at the turn of the XXII century.
Note that this intergovernmental group was established back in 1988 by two UN agencies: the World Meteorological organization and the United Nations Environment Program. The group is considered one of the most respected in the world in the field of climatology. Contribution of this Groups in science are invaluable.
And the anxiety of UN specialists is understandable: the fact that it is already now due to global warming processes little by little (for now – little by little!) ice caps are melting at the poles, ice is crumbling in the Arctic (polar sailors are already convinced with their own eyes!), supplies of fresh water, frequent periods of abnormally high air temperatures, quietly some coral reefs are dying.
The level of the oceans rises, and the water in it becomes more acid due to the dissolution of carbon dioxide in it, which enters the atmosphere as part of automobile and industrial exhaust emissions. As a result, some marine organisms experience problems with growth retardation, while others simply die. Generally, the list of “sins” of warming is long.
And this, according to the vast majority of climate scientists, is only the very, very beginning of very serious consequences for the whole planet. But what about, for example, the acclaimed Kyoto Protocol, according to to which the signatory countries (the most technologically advanced) commit to reduce air emissions?
“With regard to the Kyoto Treaty, it is no longer fashionable to speak. 2012 was the last year of its operation, so it ended, as it were, and now there is all sorts of talk about what he gave or did not give. Generally, who remembers the old, that eye is over, ”said Pravda. Ru doctor Physics and Mathematics, Deputy Director of the Institute of Physics atmosphere named after A.M. Obukhov RAS Alexander Ginzburg. – In the end last year, the evaluation report of the International Group experts, where all these results are summed up, and now I’m not very understand if this story will have any real continuation.
For the first 10-12 years of the XXI century, methods have been developed, like adapt to global warming. It is more or less understandable, but you have to be prepared for the fact that all sorts of extreme events are increasing, this is a direct consequence of warming climate, and nobody particularly argues with that.
The fact that at the end of the XX-beginning of the XXI century the Earth’s climate was warming is obviously. Climate warming is increasing extreme events. Flood on Amur last year, for example, was also a direct result of global warming. it it is impossible to predict, but one must be prepared for such events.
A photo from open sources
How to avoid the effects of warming? No way. At the worst, we just do not interfere with nature. We must behave humanly do not burn fuel more than necessary energy saving. This is good from all points of view. For the economy good for fossil conservation and climate. That is, if behave humanly, think about what we leave to the next generation, it will be easier! ”
Member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation Sergey Markov said about the climate threat and the Kyoto Protocol are as follows:
“Everything is quite simple. Those who signed this agreement small industry, not signed by those with industry big one. It seems, since it is industry that fumes and pollutes, it is industry that requires very powerful additional investments, large industrial countries refused him subscribe. At the same time, the Kyoto Protocol is precisely connected directly with greenhouse gas emissions, however, strictly in fact, it’s definitely not proven that warming is directly dependent on them.
So many people think that this warming is just cyclical that this is such a norm of development of the biogeological sphere Of the earth. But, on the other hand, the Kyoto Protocol is absolutely accurate positive in another sense – it’s not only against warming, it’s against environmental pollution, and fight this pollution anyway needed. ”
“Global climate change is accompanied by growth the number and strength of various climatic and weather anomalies, – said in an interview with Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Institute of water problems of the RAS Victor Danilov-Danilyan. – It was known a long time ago, I wrote in 2001 that global climate changes are a consequence of the imbalance of the Earth’s climate system. Therefore, these changes will necessarily be accompanied not only an increase in temperature peaks, but a deepening of the temperature wells, which Now happening in the USA. Everything goes according to theory there, this is not to be surprised.
However, some commentators and journalists who at any local cooling, they begin to say that no global warming. It’s just some kind of hard to explain frivolity. Global warming is not uniform or monotonous, there are pauses in it, even some backward movements, and Of course, in different territories it manifests itself in different ways: somewhere it happens faster (in high latitudes), somewhere slower (primarily in the equatorial zone). Judge by private examples about global – illiterate! ”
Those who prepared the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 are fine understood that the measures provided for by him were insufficient to to have a significant impact on the global process climate change, added Victor Danilov-Danilyan. All understood that this was only an attempt to organize a world community to implement the necessary measures.
In general, if climate change goes by itself unfavorable scenario, then humanity does not seem enough.
Water Global Warming Climate
