Which is better: the contraceptive revolution or world wars and climate disasters

Which is better: the contraception revolution or world wars and climate disastersA photo from open sources

Scientists are increasingly coming up with such a global challenge. before humanity, as the overpopulation of our planet. According to According to the latest data, about 8 billion live on Earth human.

If nothing is changed, then by 2050, the researchers say, the world’s population will reach 9-10 billion, and by the end of the century – 11-12 billion. All this adversely affects the environment and literally destroys the Earth, which does not withstand such a load. Even the current state of the planet is deplorable due to catastrophic huge (and rather unreasonable – which, obviously, is the main fault) population, and what will happen with its further growth.

This problem can be solved, as scientists say, only two ways. One of them is the war, the revolution that will arise more and more often, inevitable (generated by us) climatic disasters and so on, that is, everything that leads to violent the destruction of the population. And the second is the fight against fertility, medical efforts that can be called more humane and the most effective means of saving humanity.

A photo from open sources

According to a professor at Boston University, an experienced gynecologist Deborah Anderson (Deborah Anderson), humanity urgently a revolution in contraception is needed because modern drugs do not solve this problem: in the world more than 40 percent – unplanned pregnancies, and this is catastrophic many. According to the scientist, today it is necessary to create effective drugs for male contraception, since until that time in Genecology focused more on female products pregnancy protection. And here certain successes, but today they are simply not enough to solve this global problem.

And do not need to organize and conduct such a revolution save, Anderson continues, for example, 240 are spent in the USA billion dollars a year on pollution control alone environment, and these costs are expected in the coming years increase to 400 billion. So isn’t it easier and not wiser will direct these funds to a revolution in the field contraception. She will undoubtedly pay off herself handsomely.

Anderson is aware that her idea will be accepted by many in hostility. We must also take into account the fact that in the world there are many who are serious believes: Earth’s population is much smaller than what is shown UN staff. But even if this is so, then today’s population quite enough to kill our planet. Take a look around that is done with our Earth, and this is all the work of human hands. And if do nothing, then the planet itself will take care of reducing number of people, but this will not be a “quiet revolution”, but the real Apocalypse …

War

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: